Ger/CB/1915b1, Germany Battlecruiser laid down 1915
Displacement:
35,643 t light; 37,371 t standard; 40,398 t normal; 42,820 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
787.50 ft / 787.50 ft x 98.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load)
240.03 m / 240.03 m x 29.87 m x 9.45 m
Armament:
6 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (3x2 guns), 2,048.00lbs / 928.96kg shells, 1915 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Aft Main mounts separated by engine room
12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts
on side, all forward, all raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 13,584 lbs / 6,162 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 265.00 ft / 80.77 m 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
72.50 ft / 22.10 m Unarmoured ends
Upper: 6.00" / 152 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 88 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 10.0" / 254 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 3.50" / 89 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 191,368 shp / 142,760 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 7,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 5,449 tons
Complement:
1,424 - 1,852
Cost:
£5.365 million / $21.461 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1,698 tons, 4.2 %
Armour: 9,809 tons, 24.3 %
- Belts: 3,108 tons, 7.7 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 2,772 tons, 6.9 %
- Armour Deck: 3,624 tons, 9.0 %
- Conning Tower: 304 tons, 0.8 %
Machinery: 7,249 tons, 17.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 16,887 tons, 41.8 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,755 tons, 11.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
48,894 lbs / 22,178 Kg = 23.9 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 3.3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.04
Metacentric height 5.2 ft / 1.6 m
Roll period: 18.0 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 56 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.98
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.13
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.591
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.04 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 28.06 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -1.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Forecastle (18 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Mid (76 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (18 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Average freeboard: 27.74 ft / 8.46 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 90.4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 217.1 %
Waterplane Area: 55,971 Square feet or 5,200 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 107 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 203 lbs/sq ft or 989 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.54
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Friday, January 07, 2005
Another design study: Ger/CB/1915b1
By somewhat inflating my early 1970's design study for a 1915 German battlecruiser, I was able to achieve something good. The original intent was for a normal displacement of 37,500 tons. I can only guess at the protection, but I seem to have less than my original study. I had to settle for 32 knots rather than 36 knots, as well. My drawing is of a ship with three stacks and a tripod foremast with a large top, and a platform for a director. The mainmast is also a tripod.
No comments:
Post a Comment