GB/CB/1905 design study C1, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1905
Displacement:
40,301 t light; 41,617 t standard; 47,056 t normal; 51,408 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
794.00 ft / 794.00 ft x 102.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load)
242.01 m / 242.01 m x 31.09 m x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (3 mounts), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1905 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, all raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns (9 mounts), 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 8,208 lbs / 3,723 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 500.00 ft / 152.40 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 97 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.50" / 38 mm 500.00 ft / 152.40 m 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 9.00" / 229 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 2.50" / 64 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 190,809 shp / 142,344 Kw = 31.00 kts
Range 7,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 9,792 tons
Complement:
1,596 - 2,076
Cost:
£4.296 million / $17.184 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1,026 tons, 2.2 %
Armour: 8,891 tons, 18.9 %
- Belts: 3,111 tons, 6.6 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 638 tons, 1.4 %
- Armament: 2,256 tons, 4.8 %
- Armour Deck: 2,885 tons, 6.1 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 14,455 tons, 30.7 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 15,929 tons, 33.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 6,755 tons, 14.4 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
42,281 lbs / 19,178 Kg = 48.9 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.26
Metacentric height 7.8 ft / 2.4 m
Roll period: 15.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 65 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.45
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.29
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle, rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.656
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.78 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 28.18 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 37.00 ft / 11.28 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 34.00 ft / 10.36 m (33.00 ft / 10.06 m aft of break)
- Mid (73 %): 32.00 ft / 9.75 m (22.00 ft / 6.71 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Stern: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Average freeboard: 30.21 ft / 9.21 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 144.1 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 227.5 %
Waterplane Area: 62,383 Square feet or 5,796 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 102 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 174 lbs/sq ft or 848 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.31
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Saturday, January 15, 2005
I just did an experiment to see what it would take to drive a battlecruiser at 31 knots in 1905
I was determined to see what would be needed to drive a battlecruiser at 31 knots in 1905. I found out that the cost was unacceptable, due to the machinery limitations of the day. I suspected that I could greatly increase armor, however. I found out that the best that I could do, using an "all or nothing" scheme was a 9in armor basis. To do that requires a huge ship (in 1905). If anyone would have built ships to the design, they would be super-ships. There are fast, well-armed, and moderately well protected, for what they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment