GB/CB/1905 fast, Great Britain Enter ship type laid down 1905 (Engine 1943)
Displacement:
24,145 t light; 24,909 t standard; 26,709 t normal; 28,150 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
770.00 ft / 770.00 ft x 85.00 ft x 27.00 ft (normal load)
234.70 m / 234.70 m x 25.91 m x 8.23 m
Armament:
4 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (2x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1905 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
9 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side ends, majority aft, all raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 4,428 lbs / 2,009 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 580.00 ft / 176.78 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 116 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.50" / 38 mm 580.00 ft / 176.78 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 9.00" / 229 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 8.00" / 203 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 230,373 shp / 171,858 Kw = 36.00 kts
Range 8,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,241 tons
Complement:
1,044 - 1,358
Cost:
£2.143 million / $8.572 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 554 tons, 2.1 %
Armour: 6,999 tons, 26.2 %
- Belts: 2,428 tons, 9.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 805 tons, 3.0 %
- Armament: 1,126 tons, 4.2 %
- Armour Deck: 2,486 tons, 9.3 %
- Conning Tower: 154 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 5,950 tons, 22.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 10,643 tons, 39.8 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,564 tons, 9.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
33,665 lbs / 15,270 Kg = 39.0 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.4 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.12
Metacentric height 4.9 ft / 1.5 m
Roll period: 16.2 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 56 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.42
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.13
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.529
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.06 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.75 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 58 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 33.00 ft / 10.06 m
- Forecastle (67 %): 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Mid (67 %): 31.00 ft / 9.45 m (23.00 ft / 7.01 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Stern: 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Average freeboard: 28.90 ft / 8.81 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 115.4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 187.9 %
Waterplane Area: 44,789 Square feet or 4,161 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 115 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 149 lbs/sq ft or 727 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.48
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
An extreme version of the GB/CB/1905 design
This is extreme, as it uses high power output machinery (38.7 SHP/ton). The ship is faster and better protected, thanks to having lighter-weight machinery. I left the dimensions and armament as originally conceived by my friend Cliff, in 1971, so it still has 4-12in BLR and 9-6in QF. I was able to increase the armor belt to the 6in that David K. Brown had recommended to me. I also incorporated heavier barbette and turret armor, more like what I had hoped for in my 1973 recalculations. Here is the report, showing what can be done with Springsharp:
No comments:
Post a Comment