GB/CB/1905, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1905 (Engine 1916)
Displacement:
22,071 t light; 22,832 t standard; 25,295 t normal; 27,267 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
770.00 ft / 770.00 ft x 85.00 ft x 27.00 ft (normal load)
234.70 m / 234.70 m x 25.91 m x 8.23 m
Armament:
4 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (2x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1905 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
9 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side ends, majority aft, all raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 4,428 lbs / 2,009 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 100
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 510.00 ft / 155.45 m 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 102 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.50" / 38 mm 510.00 ft / 155.45 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 8.00" / 203 mm
2nd: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
- Armour deck: 2.50" / 64 mm, Conning tower: 9.00" / 229 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 154,764 shp / 115,454 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 8,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,435 tons
Complement:
1,002 - 1,303
Cost:
£2.045 million / $8.179 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 554 tons, 2.2 %
Armour: 5,629 tons, 22.3 %
- Belts: 1,793 tons, 7.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 708 tons, 2.8 %
- Armament: 943 tons, 3.7 %
- Armour Deck: 2,019 tons, 8.0 %
- Conning Tower: 167 tons, 0.7 %
Machinery: 5,766 tons, 22.8 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 10,122 tons, 40.0 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,225 tons, 12.7 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
31,134 lbs / 14,122 Kg = 36.0 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.1 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.15
Metacentric height 5.1 ft / 1.6 m
Roll period: 15.8 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.44
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.40
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.501
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.06 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.75 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -1.00 ft / -0.30 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 33.00 ft / 10.06 m
- Forecastle (67 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Mid (67 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m (22.00 ft / 6.71 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Stern: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Average freeboard: 28.16 ft / 8.58 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 118.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 182.5 %
Waterplane Area: 43,647 Square feet or 4,055 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 117 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 146 lbs/sq ft or 713 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.43
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Tuesday, February 01, 2005
If you allow for higher output machinery, the GB/CB/1905 is a supership
I adjusted the machinery date in Springsharp, so as to get a higher SHP/ton reading, and with that, the GB/CB/1905 works really well. I was actually able to add armor, and go with my revised speed of 33 knots. Frank Fox's advice was to have more and smaller caliber guns. David K. Brown had a similar comment, as well as suggesting that the belt be increased to 6in. I have posted on this subject before, but this is the first time that I have achieved a satisfactory design (essentially by cheating on power, but not unreasonably: 26.84 SHP/ton).
No comments:
Post a Comment