GB/CA/1921 x1, Great Britain Heavy Cruiser laid down 1921 (Engine 1933)
Displacement:
19,407 t light; 20,122 t standard; 22,483 t normal; 24,372 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
726.94 ft / 725.00 ft x 75.00 ft x 24.00 ft (normal load)
221.57 m / 220.98 m x 22.86 m x 7.32 m
Armament:
9 - 9.20" / 234 mm guns (3x3 guns), 389.34lbs / 176.60kg shells, 1921 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, all raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns (6x2 guns), 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1921 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 3,888 lbs / 1,764 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 430.00 ft / 131.06 m 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 91 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.00" / 25 mm 430.00 ft / 131.06 m 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 7.00" / 178 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 6.00" / 152 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 2.50" / 64 mm, Conning tower: 5.00" / 127 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 150,805 shp / 112,501 Kw = 34.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,250 tons
Complement:
917 - 1,193
Cost:
£4.334 million / $17.336 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 486 tons, 2.2 %
Armour: 5,446 tons, 24.2 %
- Belts: 1,975 tons, 8.8 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 366 tons, 1.6 %
- Armament: 1,097 tons, 4.9 %
- Armour Deck: 1,922 tons, 8.6 %
- Conning Tower: 86 tons, 0.4 %
Machinery: 4,394 tons, 19.5 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,081 tons, 40.4 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,076 tons, 13.7 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
30,751 lbs / 13,949 Kg = 79.0 x 9.2 " / 234 mm shells or 3.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.04
Metacentric height 3.5 ft / 1.1 m
Roll period: 16.8 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 78 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.69
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.56
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0.603
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.67 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 30.48 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 58 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 3.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 37.00 ft / 11.28 m
- Forecastle (78 %): 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Mid (78 %): 32.00 ft / 9.75 m (22.00 ft / 6.71 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Stern: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Average freeboard: 31.36 ft / 9.56 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 109.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 190.0 %
Waterplane Area: 41,567 Square feet or 3,862 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 124 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 126 lbs/sq ft or 617 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.92
- Longitudinal: 2.10
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Friday, February 25, 2005
My latter day armored cruiser: GB/CA/1921 x1
I just tried my fast armored cruiser design that I did on May 21, 2002. Frank Fox had encouraged me to look at 9.2in gunned armored cruisers, as he thought that was a better choice than something heavier. I had to work just a little bit to get it to work in Springsharp. Mostly, that was because I had underspecified the design in 2002. The ship has a very long forecastle and a high freeboard, which makes it a very good seaboat. Here is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment