Ger/CS/1905, Germany Scout Cruiser laid down 1905 (Engine 1931)
Displacement:
2,127 t light; 2,189 t standard; 2,240 t normal; 2,282 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
370.84 ft / 370.00 ft x 38.00 ft x 13.00 ft (normal load)
113.03 m / 112.78 m x 11.58 m x 3.96 m
Armament:
1 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing gun in a deck mount with hoist
on centreline forward
2 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread
2 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline, all aft
Weight of broadside 160 lbs / 73 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 160
2 - 18.0" / 457.2 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 2.00" / 51 mm 135.00 ft / 41.15 m 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 56 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
2nd: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
3rd: 1.00" / 25 mm - -
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 58,875 shp / 43,921 Kw = 35.00 kts
Range 2,000nm at 10.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 93 tons
Complement:
162 - 211
Cost:
£0.273 million / $1.093 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 20 tons, 0.9 %
Armour: 198 tons, 8.9 %
- Belts: 188 tons, 8.4 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 11 tons, 0.5 %
- Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 1,300 tons, 58.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 608 tons, 27.1 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 113 tons, 5.1 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
529 lbs / 240 Kg = 16.5 x 4.0 " / 102 mm shells or 0.3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.47
Metacentric height 2.3 ft / 0.7 m
Roll period: 10.6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.15
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.02
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.429
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.74 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 19.24 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 69 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Mid (36 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m (14.00 ft / 4.27 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Stern: 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Average freeboard: 17.04 ft / 5.19 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 194.2 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 153.7 %
Waterplane Area: 8,822 Square feet or 820 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 58 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 34 lbs/sq ft or 166 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.45
- Longitudinal: 2.09
- Overall: 0.52
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Saturday, May 28, 2005
Since I'm redoing Springsharp designs, here is the Ger/CS/1905 scout cruiser
The main difference about this attempt at the Ger/CS/1905 design is that I have the armament located correctly in the design. It seems a necessity, now that I know how to do it. I was able to keep the draft from getting too great, although it still is, due to the need to get adequate structural strength. The dimensions are 370ft x 38ft x 13ft. The displacement is only 2,240 tons, which is too low. The intended normal displacement is 2,480 tons. The speed is not quite what I wanted, as it is just 35 knots, not 36. The cruising speed and range are too low, but the only way to do better is to have a better SHP/ton for the machinery. I'm already skewing the date to get it. At about 45SHP/ton, it is still much below the maximum output achieved by the British super-destroyer Swift, which could produce 60SHP/ton, and in the same time period as this design. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment