F/CA/1917 Mod.A, France Heavy Cruiser laid down 1917 (Engine 1923)
Displacement:
17,768 t light; 18,499 t standard; 19,900 t normal; 21,021 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
730.08 ft / 729.00 ft x 80.00 ft x 24.00 ft (normal load)
222.53 m / 222.20 m x 24.38 m x 7.32 m
Armament:
6 - 11.00" / 279 mm guns (2x3 guns), 665.50lbs / 301.87kg shells, 1917 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline, all forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring
8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1917 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all aft
Weight of broadside 4,857 lbs / 2,203 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
6 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 3.00" / 76 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 78 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 8.00" / 203 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
- Armour deck: 1.00" / 25 mm, Conning tower: 8.00" / 203 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 176,586 shp / 131,733 Kw = 35.20 kts
Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,521 tons
Complement:
837 - 1,089
Cost:
£3.560 million / $14.241 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 607 tons, 3.1 %
Armour: 2,292 tons, 11.5 %
- Belts: 438 tons, 2.2 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 1,010 tons, 5.1 %
- Armour Deck: 717 tons, 3.6 %
- Conning Tower: 127 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 5,902 tons, 29.7 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 8,967 tons, 45.1 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,132 tons, 10.7 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
18,002 lbs / 8,165 Kg = 27.1 x 11.0 " / 279 mm shells or 1.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.19
Metacentric height 4.9 ft / 1.5 m
Roll period: 15.2 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 53 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.53
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.06
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.498
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.11 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.00 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 57 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Mid (73 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Average freeboard: 24.24 ft / 7.39 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 119.3 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 201.0 %
Waterplane Area: 38,773 Square feet or 3,602 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 105 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 151 lbs/sq ft or 738 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.43
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
A further variant: the F/CA/1917 Mod.B
On the next page of the Red Book, the French fast cruiser is modified further with a heavier armament and lighter protection. The armament is 6-11in (35 ton) BLR and 8-6in QF (6 ton) guns. I followed the weights as closely as I could. The machinery is intended to be 30 SHP/ton and to have 191,400 SHP. The protection drops to only 1,207 tons, in the specification. I was not able to hit these numbers exactly, but I came close. By the time I adjusted the displacement to achieve an adequate strength and seakeeping, the SHP dropped, along with the machinery weight. This is the new Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment