GB/CS/1915, Great Britain Scout Cruiser laid down 1915 (Engine 1941)
Displacement:
2,780 t light; 2,880 t standard; 3,200 t normal; 3,456 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
409.21 ft / 405.00 ft x 41.00 ft x 15.00 ft (normal load)
124.73 m / 123.44 m x 12.50 m x 4.57 m
Armament:
4 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 432 lbs / 196 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 150
4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 2.00" / 51 mm 270.00 ft / 82.30 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 103 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 48,338 shp / 36,060 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 5,400nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 576 tons
Complement:
212 - 276
Cost:
£0.456 million / $1.825 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 54 tons, 1.7 %
Armour: 635 tons, 19.8 %
- Belts: 201 tons, 6.3 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 42 tons, 1.3 %
- Armour Deck: 392 tons, 12.2 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 1,222 tons, 38.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 870 tons, 27.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 420 tons, 13.1 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
1,512 lbs / 686 Kg = 14.0 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 0.6 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.33
Metacentric height 2.2 ft / 0.7 m
Roll period: 11.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.36
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.02
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle, rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.450
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.88 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 20.12 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 64 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 6.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m (17.00 ft / 5.18 m aft of break)
- Mid (50 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m (15.00 ft / 4.57 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Stern: 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Average freeboard: 15.97 ft / 4.87 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 136.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 122.4 %
Waterplane Area: 10,589 Square feet or 984 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 88 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 45 lbs/sq ft or 219 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.57
- Longitudinal: 1.44
- Overall: 0.62
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Monday, July 17, 2006
The GB/CS/1915 design from the Red Book
I have had trouble with getting a good result from Springsharp with the GB/CS/1914 scout cruiser. This and a fast gunboat design were conceived by my friend Cliff, back in 1971, as what he wanted to build, starting in 1915. I have tried to stay close to his concept, while working at having an acceptable Springsharp report. The main concern I have about what the design is the roll period is probably too short. The ship has an ambitious 32 knot speed and carries 4-6in QF guns with 4-21in TT. I worked in some light protection, and Springsharp did that while still letting me get by with the fast, light combatant strength (between 0.5 and 1.0). This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment