Ger/CL/1916, Germany Light Cruiser laid down 1916 (Engine 1941)
Displacement:
5,921 t light; 6,052 t standard; 6,550 t normal; 6,949 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
478.96 ft / 475.00 ft x 48.00 ft x 18.00 ft (normal load)
145.99 m / 144.78 m x 14.63 m x 5.49 m
Armament:
6 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns (3x2 guns), 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1916 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline ends, majority aft, 1 raised mount aft - superfiring
Weight of broadside 648 lbs / 294 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 0
4 - 23.6" / 600.0001 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 350.00 ft / 106.68 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m
Ends: 2.00" / 51 mm 125.00 ft / 38.10 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m
Main Belt covers 113 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.00" / 25 mm 350.00 ft / 106.68 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 5.00" / 127 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 60,562 shp / 45,179 Kw = 30.50 kts
Range 5,400nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 897 tons
Complement:
363 - 473
Cost:
£0.817 million / $3.268 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 81 tons, 1.2 %
Armour: 1,774 tons, 27.1 %
- Belts: 800 tons, 12.2 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 207 tons, 3.2 %
- Armament: 136 tons, 2.1 %
- Armour Deck: 594 tons, 9.1 %
- Conning Tower: 38 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 1,600 tons, 24.4 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 2,465 tons, 37.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 629 tons, 9.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
9,263 lbs / 4,202 Kg = 85.8 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 1.6 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.13
Metacentric height 2.1 ft / 0.6 m
Roll period: 14.0 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 64 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.41
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.28
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.559
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.90 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 21.79 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 61 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 4.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Mid (32 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Average freeboard: 20.72 ft / 6.32 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 151.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 138.9 %
Waterplane Area: 16,041 Square feet or 1,490 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 116 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 80 lbs/sq ft or 392 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.90
- Longitudinal: 2.43
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Monday, July 03, 2006
I had to increase the displacement for the Ger/CL/1916 design
I was struggling to achieve adequate strength in the Ger/CL/1916 design. I had to increase the hull depth and the displacement. I was able to achieve the machinery power and close to the weight. The protection weight was also what was desired. The armament is 6-6in guns and 4-23.6in TT. The belt is actually 4in and the deck is 2in. Altogether, the ship is very well protected. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment