Ger/CB/1917 very fast, Germany Battlecruiser laid down 1917 (Engine 1927)
Displacement:
34,397 t light; 36,071 t standard; 38,100 t normal; 39,723 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
852.97 ft / 850.00 ft x 105.00 ft x 30.00 ft (normal load)
259.99 m / 259.08 m x 32.00 m x 9.14 m
Armament:
6 - 18.00" / 457 mm guns (2x3 guns), 2,916.00lbs / 1,322.68kg shells, 1917 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread
10 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns in single mounts, 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1917 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 18,121 lbs / 8,220 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 540.00 ft / 164.59 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 98 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 560.00 ft / 170.69 m 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 4.00" / 102 mm 6.00" / 152 mm
2nd: 3.00" / 76 mm 3.00" / 76 mm 3.00" / 76 mm
- Armour deck: 1.00" / 25 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 6 shafts, 275,894 shp / 205,817 Kw = 36.00 kts
Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,652 tons
Complement:
1,363 - 1,772
Cost:
£7.865 million / $31.460 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,265 tons, 5.9 %
Armour: 4,839 tons, 12.7 %
- Belts: 1,104 tons, 2.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,326 tons, 3.5 %
- Armament: 1,310 tons, 3.4 %
- Armour Deck: 1,098 tons, 2.9 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 8,709 tons, 22.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 18,584 tons, 48.8 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,703 tons, 9.7 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
33,698 lbs / 15,285 Kg = 11.6 x 18.0 " / 457 mm shells or 4.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.26
Metacentric height 8.2 ft / 2.5 m
Roll period: 15.4 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 52 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.64
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.04
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.498
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.10 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 29.15 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 5.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 34.00 ft / 10.36 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Mid (50 %): 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Stern: 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Average freeboard: 27.56 ft / 8.40 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 145.9 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 224.0 %
Waterplane Area: 59,359 Square feet or 5,515 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 94 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 215 lbs/sq ft or 1,048 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.49
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
A very fast battlecruiser: Ger/CB/1917
I don't believe that I have published this previously: Ger/CB/1917. I did not give the design a designation on the specification page, but this is my estimate. The ship was to be a 36,000 ton Standard battlecruiser with 6-18in and 10-5in guns. The normal displacement was to be 37,500 tons. I had hoped for very extreme and unrealistic speeds, but 36 knots is still pretty good. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment