GB/BB/1912 a2, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1912 (Engine 1917)
Displacement:
37,282 t light; 38,970 t standard; 42,620 t normal; 45,539 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
700.00 ft / 700.00 ft x 105.00 ft x 33.00 ft (normal load)
213.36 m / 213.36 m x 32.00 m x 10.06 m
Armament:
9 - 15.00" / 381 mm guns (3x3 guns), 1,687.50lbs / 765.44kg shells, 1912 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, all raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1912 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 16,484 lbs / 7,477 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 14.0" / 356 mm 460.00 ft / 140.21 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 101 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 460.00 ft / 140.21 m 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14.0" / 356 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 13.0" / 330 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 7.00" / 178 mm, Conning tower: 9.00" / 229 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 80,283 shp / 59,891 Kw = 25.00 kts
Range 9,600nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 6,569 tons
Complement:
1,483 - 1,928
Cost:
£3.448 million / $13.791 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,060 tons, 4.8 %
Armour: 16,317 tons, 38.3 %
- Belts: 4,483 tons, 10.5 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 919 tons, 2.2 %
- Armament: 3,619 tons, 8.5 %
- Armour Deck: 7,060 tons, 16.6 %
- Conning Tower: 237 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 2,943 tons, 6.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 15,963 tons, 37.5 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,337 tons, 12.5 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
63,315 lbs / 28,719 Kg = 37.5 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 10.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.03
Metacentric height 5.7 ft / 1.7 m
Roll period: 18.4 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.74
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.55
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.615
Length to Beam Ratio: 6.67 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 26.46 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 48 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 45
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Forecastle (67 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Mid (67 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Average freeboard: 26.16 ft / 7.97 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 73.1 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 140.0 %
Waterplane Area: 54,514 Square feet or 5,064 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 110 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 204 lbs/sq ft or 994 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.94
- Longitudinal: 1.73
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Monday, February 28, 2005
I reconsidered the GB/BB/1912 design
I would like to think that it would be fair game to allow for a higher speed for the GB/BB/1912 design, while the nominal speed is 22 knots, to allow for 25 knots. The "natural speed", according to Springsharp, is 26.46 knots, so 25 knots is still "underperforming". I also have been vascillating about my reading of the sketch records from 1971, and decided that my original estimate of the secondary armament as 12-6in QF guns was more likely to be correct, and that the one spot where there was a 14/6 reference, that it was Belt/Deck armor. Eventually, the deck armor was 7in, as my cross sectional drawing indicates. This is the revised Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment