GB/CA/1905, Great Britain Armoured Cruiser laid down 1905 (Engine 1907)
Displacement:
13,369 t light; 13,900 t standard; 16,300 t normal; 18,220 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
555.00 ft / 555.00 ft x 76.00 ft x 26.00 ft (normal load)
169.16 m / 169.16 m x 23.16 m x 7.92 m
Armament:
8 - 9.20" / 234 mm guns (4x2 guns), 380.00lbs / 172.37kg shells, 1905 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread
16 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1905 Model
Quick firing guns in casemate mounts
on side, all amidships
12 guns in hull casemates - Limited use in heavy seas
Weight of broadside 3,552 lbs / 1,611 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 100
4 - 18.0" / 457.2 mm submerged torpedo tubes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 155.00 ft / 47.24 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Main Belt covers 111 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.50" / 38 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 7.00" / 178 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 7.00" / 178 mm
2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 7.00" / 178 mm
Machinery:
Coal fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 45,828 shp / 34,187 Kw = 25.00 kts
Range 5,200nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,321 tons (100% coal)
Complement:
720 - 937
Cost:
£1.250 million / $4.999 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 453 tons, 2.8 %
Armour: 4,672 tons, 28.7 %
- Belts: 1,981 tons, 12.2 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 555 tons, 3.4 %
- Armament: 980 tons, 6.0 %
- Armour Deck: 1,059 tons, 6.5 %
- Conning Tower: 97 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 2,864 tons, 17.6 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 5,379 tons, 33.0 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,931 tons, 18.0 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
23,223 lbs / 10,534 Kg = 59.6 x 9.2 " / 234 mm shells or 3.6 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.28
Metacentric height 5.2 ft / 1.6 m
Roll period: 14.0 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 74 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.35
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.47
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.520
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.30 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 23.56 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Mid (67 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m (15.00 ft / 4.57 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
- Stern: 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
- Average freeboard: 20.60 ft / 6.28 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 110.3 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 157.4 %
Waterplane Area: 28,630 Square feet or 2,660 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 116 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 123 lbs/sq ft or 601 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.95
- Longitudinal: 1.62
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Monday, November 21, 2005
A British 1905 armoured cruiser
I found out quickly that to achieve a reasonable 1905 British armoured cruiser, we needed to use lighter machinery than 12 SHP/ton of machinery. In the real world, the Invincibles had somewhat lighter machinery than that (although only 12.44 SHP/ton). The problem is partly that my armour weight is 4,672 tons while the Invincibles had just 3,460 tons of armour. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment