GB/BB/1913, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1913
Displacement:
30,154 t light; 31,523 t standard; 34,500 t normal; 36,882 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
675.00 ft / 675.00 ft x 90.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load)
205.74 m / 205.74 m x 27.43 m x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 15.00" / 381 mm guns (4x2 guns), 1,687.50lbs / 765.44kg shells, 1913 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
14 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1913 Model
Quick firing guns in casemate mounts
on side, evenly spread, 4 raised mounts
Weight of broadside 15,012 lbs / 6,809 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm submerged torpedo tubes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: 5.00" / 127 mm 225.00 ft / 68.58 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Main Belt covers 103 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 12.0" / 305 mm
2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm
- Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 95,921 shp / 71,557 Kw = 27.00 kts
Range 5,600nm at 17.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 5,359 tons
Complement:
1,265 - 1,645
Cost:
£3.445 million / $13.780 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1,877 tons, 5.4 %
Armour: 12,127 tons, 35.1 %
- Belts: 4,372 tons, 12.7 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 999 tons, 2.9 %
- Armament: 3,066 tons, 8.9 %
- Armour Deck: 3,416 tons, 9.9 %
- Conning Tower: 274 tons, 0.8 %
Machinery: 3,759 tons, 10.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 12,393 tons, 35.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,346 tons, 12.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
41,367 lbs / 18,764 Kg = 24.5 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 5.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.05
Metacentric height 4.7 ft / 1.4 m
Roll period: 17.5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 53 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.92
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.06
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.641
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.50 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 25.98 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 29.00 ft / 8.84 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Mid (67 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m (16.00 ft / 4.88 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Stern: 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Average freeboard: 21.76 ft / 6.63 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 100.5 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 151.4 %
Waterplane Area: 46,162 Square feet or 4,289 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 100 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 185 lbs/sq ft or 903 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.33
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Thursday, November 24, 2005
OK, so now how about the 15in-gunned fast battleship
We seem to be on a roll, so let us try the 15in-gunned fast battleship to be laid down in 1913. By accepting slightly lower protection than we might otherwise have, we have a 27-knot ship with a 17 knot cruising speed and a 5,600nm range. The armour basis is 12in, which should do quite well for a WWI-style ship. I actually reduced length and beam to achieve adequate composite strength. I also have lowered the freeboard for that same end. Does this seem reasonable and useful? This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment