US/CL/1914, United States Light Cruiser laid down 1914
Displacement:
5,645 t light; 5,842 t standard; 6,600 t normal; 7,206 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
478.75 ft / 475.00 ft x 49.00 ft x 17.00 ft (normal load)
145.92 m / 144.78 m x 14.94 m x 5.18 m
Armament:
5 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns in single mounts, 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1914 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline ends, majority forward, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
4 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns in single mounts, 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1914 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships
2 - 3.00" / 76.2 mm guns in single mounts, 13.50lbs / 6.12kg shells, 1914 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 590 lbs / 267 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 180
4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 130 % of normal length
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 3.00" / 76 mm
2nd: 4.00" / 102 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 3.00" / 76 mm
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 4.00" / 102 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 50,206 shp / 37,454 Kw = 29.00 kts
Range 5,400nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 1,364 tons
Complement:
365 - 475
Cost:
£0.675 million / $2.699 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 74 tons, 1.1 %
Armour: 1,523 tons, 23.1 %
- Belts: 773 tons, 11.7 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 99 tons, 1.5 %
- Armour Deck: 620 tons, 9.4 %
- Conning Tower: 30 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 1,934 tons, 29.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 2,115 tons, 32.0 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 955 tons, 14.5 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
7,519 lbs / 3,410 Kg = 120.3 x 5.0 " / 127 mm shells or 1.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.31
Metacentric height 2.8 ft / 0.8 m
Roll period: 12.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 54 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.22
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.07
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.584
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.69 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 21.79 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 59 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 4.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Mid (37 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m (14.00 ft / 4.27 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Stern: 14.00 ft / 4.27 m
- Average freeboard: 17.20 ft / 5.24 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 104.3 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 124.1 %
Waterplane Area: 16,767 Square feet or 1,558 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 110 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 77 lbs/sq ft or 377 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.40
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Monday, January 09, 2006
A new series starting with the US/CL/1914
In a lost series of drawings from 1976, I had this concept for an American light cruiser for 1914 or thereabouts. The design is rather like the British Town class, except with 5in guns. I had thought that the 5in/51 QF gun had a good range and rate of fire, probably with a 60 lb. shot/shell, so that the piece was still fairly hard-hitting. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment