US/CL/1918, United States Light Cruiser laid down 1918 (Engine 1941)
Displacement:
7,891 t light; 8,134 t standard; 8,750 t normal; 9,242 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
558.89 ft / 555.00 ft x 54.00 ft x 20.00 ft (normal load)
170.35 m / 169.16 m x 16.46 m x 6.10 m
Armament:
8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns (4x2 guns), 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1918 Model
Quick firing guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
4 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1918 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships
16 - 0.50" / 12.7 mm guns in single mounts, 0.06lbs / 0.03kg shells, 1918 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 993 lbs / 450 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
12 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 3.00" / 76 mm 420.00 ft / 128.02 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 116 % of normal length
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 3.00" / 76 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 3.00" / 76 mm
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 3.00" / 76 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 102,606 shp / 76,544 Kw = 34.00 kts
Range 5,600nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 1,108 tons
Complement:
452 - 588
Cost:
£1.520 million / $6.081 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 124 tons, 1.4 %
Armour: 1,608 tons, 18.4 %
- Belts: 614 tons, 7.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 220 tons, 2.5 %
- Armour Deck: 746 tons, 8.5 %
- Conning Tower: 27 tons, 0.3 %
Machinery: 2,712 tons, 31.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 3,447 tons, 39.4 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 859 tons, 9.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
9,018 lbs / 4,090 Kg = 83.5 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 1.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.17
Metacentric height 2.7 ft / 0.8 m
Roll period: 13.9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 54 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.40
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.08
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.511
Length to Beam Ratio: 10.28 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 23.56 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 61 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 4.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 27.00 ft / 8.23 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Mid (67 %): 23.00 ft / 7.01 m (15.00 ft / 4.57 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
- Stern: 15.00 ft / 4.57 m
- Average freeboard: 20.68 ft / 6.30 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 111.5 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 127.9 %
Waterplane Area: 20,169 Square feet or 1,874 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 109 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 96 lbs/sq ft or 467 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.94
- Longitudinal: 1.87
- Overall: 1.01
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This is a forum for discussion of topics relating to the Dreadnought era, prior to the ascendency of naval aviation. We will be discussing history, ship design, and naval wargaming.
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
The US/CL/1918 design
My US/CL/1918 design is an attempt to modernize the light cruiser with turrets, while otherwise retaining the characteristics that it has acquired so far. the armament is now 8-6in QF, 4-4in AA, 16-0.5in MG (AA), and 12-21in TT. The armour basis is 3in with a maximum speed, without pressing, of 34 knots. The range is now 5,600nm at 15 knots. The design is still dependent on very lightweight machinery. This is the Springsharp report:
No comments:
Post a Comment