GB/CB/1907, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1907 (Engine 1914)
Displacement:
23,503 t light; 24,248 t standard; 25,780 t normal; 27,005 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
770.00 ft / 770.00 ft x 90.00 ft x 28.00 ft (normal load)
234.70 m / 234.70 m x 27.43 m x 8.53 m
Armament:
4 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (2x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1907 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
9 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1907 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all aft, all raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 4,428 lbs / 2,009 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 465.00 ft / 141.73 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 93 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.50" / 38 mm 465.00 ft / 141.73 m 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 9.00" / 229 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 7.00" / 178 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 155,110 shp / 115,712 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 7,500nm at 12.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,757 tons
Complement:
1,016 - 1,322
Cost:
£2.124 million / $8.496 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 554 tons, 2.1 %
Armour: 6,371 tons, 24.7 %
- Belts: 2,024 tons, 7.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 645 tons, 2.5 %
- Armament: 1,085 tons, 4.2 %
- Armour Deck: 2,484 tons, 9.6 %
- Conning Tower: 132 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 5,975 tons, 23.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 10,604 tons, 41.1 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,277 tons, 8.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
31,393 lbs / 14,240 Kg = 36.3 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.14
Metacentric height 5.5 ft / 1.7 m
Roll period: 16.2 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 72 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.38
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.45
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.465
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.56 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.75 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 52 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 33.00 ft / 10.06 m
- Forecastle (72 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Mid (72 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m (22.00 ft / 6.71 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Stern: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Average freeboard: 28.62 ft / 8.72 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 117.9 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 184.6 %
Waterplane Area: 44,763 Square feet or 4,159 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 113 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 151 lbs/sq ft or 735 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.53
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
I don't understand why this is so "good": GB/CB/1907
I really don't understand why this design is so "good" in Springsharp, or why it was so easy to optimize. This is the 12in/50 gunned version of the basic light British battlecruiser type that my friend Cliff designed in 1971. The original two ships were to have 4-12in/45 guns while the follow-on ships were to have 12in/50 guns. I had assumed that they would be larger and could have had better protection.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment