Ger/CB/1911, Germany Battlecruiser laid down 1911 (Engine 1927)
Displacement:
26,465 t light; 27,492 t standard; 35,900 t normal; 42,626 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
752.00 ft / 750.00 ft x 100.00 ft x 30.00 ft (normal load)
229.21 m / 228.60 m x 30.48 m x 9.14 m
Armament:
6 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns in single mounts, 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1911 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline, all forward, 3 raised mounts - superfiring
8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1911 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 6,048 lbs / 2,743 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 82 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 8.00" / 203 mm
2nd: 4.00" / 102 mm 4.00" / 102 mm 4.00" / 102 mm
- Armour deck: 5.00" / 127 mm, Conning tower: 8.00" / 203 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 139,569 shp / 104,118 Kw = 30.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 22.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 15,134 tons
Complement:
1,303 - 1,695
Cost:
£2.178 million / $8.712 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 756 tons, 2.1 %
Armour: 9,439 tons, 26.3 %
- Belts: 1,824 tons, 5.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 888 tons, 2.5 %
- Armament: 1,659 tons, 4.6 %
- Armour Deck: 4,880 tons, 13.6 %
- Conning Tower: 188 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 4,406 tons, 12.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 11,864 tons, 33.0 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 9,435 tons, 26.3 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
75,449 lbs / 34,223 Kg = 87.3 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 12.1 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.29
Metacentric height 7.9 ft / 2.4 m
Roll period: 14.9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 74 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.32
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.48
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.558
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.50 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 27.39 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 35.00 ft / 10.67 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Mid (50 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Stern: 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Average freeboard: 26.72 ft / 8.14 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 70.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 200.5 %
Waterplane Area: 52,758 Square feet or 4,901 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 148 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 154 lbs/sq ft or 750 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.48
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
My power estimates for the Ger/CB/1911 were quite good
The methods that I had used in the early 1970's to estimate the power required for the Ger/CB/1911 were quite good. For a displacement of about 35,000 tons, I had estimated 140,000 SHP to achieve a speed of 30 knots. The ship, as designed, however, had a great deal of excess capacity, so to speak, so to use what was there, I greatly increased the range and cruising speed, while reducing the displacement. The result is that the standard displacement is only 27,492 tons, which is not unreasonable. The ship, as designed, had very light weight machinery, which is part of the explanation for why the tonnage was underutilized. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment