Colonel Cunibert's Ideal Battleship, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1903 (Engine 1912) Displacement: 19,187 t light; 20,122 t standard; 23,186 t normal; 25,637 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 521.50 ft / 521.50 ft x 91.00 ft x 30.00 ft (normal load) 158.95 m / 158.95 m x 27.74 m x 9.14 m Armament: 12 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (8 mounts), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1903 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on side ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts - superfiring Main guns limited to end-on fire 12 - 3.00" / 76.2 mm guns in single mounts, 13.50lbs / 6.12kg shells, 1903 Model Quick firing guns in casemate mounts on side, all amidships 12 guns in hull casemates - Limited use in heavy seas 6 - 1.85" / 47.0 mm guns in single mounts, 3.17lbs / 1.44kg shells, 1903 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts on side, all amidships, all raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 10,549 lbs / 4,785 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 380.00 ft / 115.82 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 141.50 ft / 43.13 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Upper: 6.00" / 152 mm 380.00 ft / 115.82 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m Main Belt covers 112 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 380.00 ft / 115.82 m 27.00 ft / 8.23 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 7.00" / 178 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - - - Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 7.00" / 178 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 52,127 shp / 38,887 Kw = 24.00 kts Range 9,600nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 5,515 tons Complement: 939 - 1,221 Cost: £2.070 million / $8.281 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,319 tons, 5.7 % Armour: 6,792 tons, 29.3 % - Belts: 2,163 tons, 9.3 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 759 tons, 3.3 % - Armament: 2,498 tons, 10.8 % - Armour Deck: 1,249 tons, 5.4 % - Conning Tower: 123 tons, 0.5 % Machinery: 2,078 tons, 9.0 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 8,997 tons, 38.8 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,999 tons, 17.2 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 25,730 lbs / 11,671 Kg = 29.8 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.0 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 0.95 Metacentric height 3.9 ft / 1.2 m Roll period: 19.4 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 60 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 1.06 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.19 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.570 Length to Beam Ratio: 5.73 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 22.84 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (68 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (17.00 ft / 5.18 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 17.00 ft / 5.18 m - Stern: 17.00 ft / 5.18 m - Average freeboard: 23.28 ft / 7.10 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 91.8 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 161.9 % Waterplane Area: 33,747 Square feet or 3,135 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 108 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 180 lbs/sq ft or 881 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.91 - Longitudinal: 2.27 - Overall: 1.00 Caution: Poor stability - excessive risk of capsizing Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Sunday, April 24, 2005
My very latest attempt at designing Colonel Cuniberti's Ideal Battleship
The main deviations for my Springsharp design for Colonel Cuniberti's Ideal Battleship for the British navy are excessive beam and displacement. The armor is also lighter than he had envisioned. The main obstacle to doing what he wanted is stability, due to the armament on a relatively small ship, as well as the machinery required to make 24 knots. I hope to make a paper model of the ship to aid my perspective efforts. My first attempts will be for the Ideal Battleship and for the Ger/CS/1905. This is the latest Springsharp report for the Ideal Battleship. I suspect that part of the problem is specifying the gun mounts and heights. The defaults in Springsharp seem to be wrong.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment