GB/CB/1921 Modified, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1921
Displacement:
41,058 t light; 43,093 t standard; 45,500 t normal; 47,425 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
814.00 ft / 814.00 ft x 104.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load)
248.11 m / 248.11 m x 31.70 m x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (4x2 guns), 2,048.00lbs / 928.96kg shells, 1921 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
2 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (1x2 guns), 2,048.00lbs / 928.96kg shells, 1921 Model
Breech loading guns in a turret (on a barbette)
on side amidships
14 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1921 Model
Quick firing guns in casemate mounts
on side, evenly spread
14 guns in hull casemates - Limited use in heavy seas
Weight of broadside 21,992 lbs / 9,975 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 90
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 505.00 ft / 153.92 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Upper: 8.00" / 203 mm 505.00 ft / 153.92 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 95 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 505.00 ft / 153.92 m 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 12.0" / 305 mm
2nd: 12.0" / 305 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 12.0" / 305 mm
3rd: 6.00" / 152 mm 4.00" / 102 mm 6.00" / 152 mm
- Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 159,219 shp / 118,777 Kw = 30.00 kts
Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,332 tons
Complement:
1,556 - 2,024
Cost:
£11.490 million / $45.959 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,749 tons, 6.0 %
Armour: 13,643 tons, 30.0 %
- Belts: 3,143 tons, 6.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,158 tons, 2.5 %
- Armament: 4,401 tons, 9.7 %
- Armour Deck: 4,611 tons, 10.1 %
- Conning Tower: 330 tons, 0.7 %
Machinery: 5,483 tons, 12.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 19,183 tons, 42.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,442 tons, 9.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
53,947 lbs / 24,470 Kg = 26.3 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 7.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.08
Metacentric height 6.1 ft / 1.9 m
Roll period: 17.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 55 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.84
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.607
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.83 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 28.53 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Mid (50 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Average freeboard: 24.24 ft / 7.39 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 104.4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 180.7 %
Waterplane Area: 62,311 Square feet or 5,789 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 98 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 219 lbs/sq ft or 1,070 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.98
- Longitudinal: 1.20
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Sunday, January 21, 2007
I thought I should try a more Amagi-like British battlecruiser
I believe that the Japanese Amagi class ships only had a 10in belt, so I thought that I should redesign my British ship to be more like that. I was also not happy with the great displacement that was required. This is the Springsharp report for the revised design:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment