GB/BB/1906, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1906 Displacement: 23,005 t light; 23,811 t standard; 26,500 t normal; 28,652 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 680.00 ft / 680.00 ft x 87.70 ft x 27.00 ft (normal load) 207.26 m / 207.26 m x 26.73 m x 8.23 m Armament: 6 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (3x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1906 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline, evenly spread, 1 raised mount Aft Main mounts separated by engine room 8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns (4x2 guns), 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1906 Model Quick firing guns in turrets (on barbettes) on side, all amidships Weight of broadside 6,048 lbs / 2,743 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 13.7" / 348 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 84 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 13.7" / 348 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 13.7" / 348 mm 2nd: 6.00" / 152 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 6.00" / 152 mm - Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 13.70" / 348 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 50,515 shp / 37,684 Kw = 24.00 kts Range 5,600nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 4,841 tons Complement: 1,038 - 1,350 Cost: £1.899 million / $7.598 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 756 tons, 2.9 % Armour: 9,371 tons, 35.4 % - Belts: 3,597 tons, 13.6 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 712 tons, 2.7 % - Armament: 2,433 tons, 9.2 % - Armour Deck: 2,367 tons, 8.9 % - Conning Tower: 262 tons, 1.0 % Machinery: 3,280 tons, 12.4 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,598 tons, 36.2 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,495 tons, 13.2 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 46,879 lbs / 21,264 Kg = 54.3 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 7.4 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.12 Metacentric height 5.1 ft / 1.5 m Roll period: 16.4 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 87 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.57 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.73 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.576 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.75 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 26.08 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 43 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -1.00 ft / -0.30 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (65 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Average freeboard: 23.44 ft / 7.14 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 80.5 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 184.2 % Waterplane Area: 42,648 Square feet or 3,962 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 121 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 153 lbs/sq ft or 749 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.97 - Longitudinal: 1.40 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
Amazon Ad
Friday, September 23, 2005
The GB/BB/1906 battleship drawing from August 2001
I have a pencil drawing from August 2001 for the GB/BB/1906 battleship. My friend Cliff had conceived this design as a fast battleship that sacrificed armament to get speed and protection. I have kept the citadel armor the same length as the drawing, even though it is short, according to Springsharp. The nominal displacement intended was 25,000 tons, but that was too small for a normal displacement for this design. I had to increase that to 26,500 tons, which produced a standard displacement of only 23,811 tons. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment