Southampton, anachronistic, Great Britain Light Cruiser laid down 1914 (Engine 1918) Displacement: 5,028 t light; 5,231 t standard; 5,733 t normal; 6,135 t full load Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep) (458.84 ft / 454.00 ft) x 50.00 ft x (17.00 / 17.88 ft) (139.85 m / 138.38 m) x 15.24 m x (5.18 / 5.45 m) Armament: 9 - 6.00" / 152 mm 45.0 cal guns - 100.00lbs / 45.36kg shells, 150 per gun Quick firing guns in turret on barbette mounts , 1914 Model 3 x Triple mounts on centreline ends, majority forward 2 raised mounts - superfiring 4 - 4.00" / 102 mm 45.0 cal guns - 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 150 per gun Anti-air guns in deck mounts , 1914 Model 2 x Twin mounts on sides, forward deck aft 20 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm 45.0 cal guns - 2.00lbs / 0.91kg shells, 150 per gun Anti-air guns in deck mounts , 1914 Model 4 x 2 row quad mounts on sides, evenly spread 4 raised mounts 1 x 2 row quad mount on centreline, aft deck aft Weight of broadside 1,068 lbs / 1,068 kg 4 - 21.0" / 533 mm above water torpedoes Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 300.00 ft / 91.44 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 102 % of normal length - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 3.00" / 76 mm 4.00" / 102 mm - Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 4.00" / 102 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 2 shafts, 22,139 shp / 16,516 Kw = 25.00 kts Range 4,800nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 904 tons Complement: 329 - 428 Cost: £0.495 million / $1.981 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 253 tons, 4.4 % Armour: 1,720 tons, 30.0 % - Belts: 805 tons, 14.0 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 % - Armament: 295 tons, 5.1 % - Armour Deck: 593 tons, 10.3 % - Conning Tower: 28 tons, 0.5 % Machinery: 799 tons, 13.9 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 2,389 tons, 41.7 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 706 tons, 12.3 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 11,307 lbs / 5,129 Kg = 104.7 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 2.1 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.01 Metacentric height 1.8 ft / 0.5 m Roll period: 15.7 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 85 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.87 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.70 Hull form characteristics: Hull has a flush deck, a normal bow and small transom stern Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.520 / 0.529 Length to Beam Ratio: 9.08 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 24.44 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 52 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 6.00 degrees Stern overhang: 2.00 ft / 0.61 m Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length): Fore end, Aft end - Forecastle: 20.00 %, 27.00 ft / 8.23 m, 21.00 ft / 6.40 m - Forward deck: 30.00 %, 21.00 ft / 6.40 m, 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Aft deck: 30.00 %, 18.00 ft / 5.49 m, 16.00 ft / 4.88 m - Quarter deck: 20.00 %, 16.00 ft / 4.88 m, 17.00 ft / 5.18 m - Average freeboard: 18.93 ft / 5.77 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 62.6 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 148.8 % Waterplane Area: 16,027 Square feet or 1,489 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 134 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 88 lbs/sq ft or 432 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.92 - Longitudinal: 2.25 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
Amazon Ad
Saturday, April 14, 2007
An anchronistic Southampton light cruiser
In 1999, I drew a "not to scale", freehand anachronistic version of the British light cruiser Southampton. This was the original drawing:
I thought that would make a good candidate for a Springsharp 3.0b1 Beta design. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment