Repulse, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1915 (Engine 1919) Displacement: 28,729 t light; 29,990 t standard; 31,989 t normal; 33,588 t full load Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep) (800.00 ft / 794.00 ft) x 89.00 ft x (29.67 / 30.82 ft) (243.84 m / 242.01 m) x 27.13 m x (9.04 / 9.39 m) Armament: 6 - 15.00" / 381 mm 42.0 cal guns - 1,920.00lbs / 870.90kg shells, 90 per gun Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts , 1915 Model 3 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, majority forward 1 raised mount - superfiring 17 - 4.00" / 102 mm 45.0 cal guns - 32.27lbs / 14.64kg shells, 150 per gun Quick firing guns in deck and hoist mounts , 1915 Model 4 x Twin mounts on sides, evenly spread 3 x Triple mounts on centreline, aft deck forward 2 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 12,069 lbs / 12,069 kg Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 490.00 ft / 149.35 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 300.00 ft / 91.44 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m 4.00 ft / 1.22 m Unarmoured ends Main Belt covers 95 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Torpedo Bulkhead: 1.50" / 38 mm 490.00 ft / 149.35 m 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 2nd: 3.00" / 76 mm - 2.00" / 51 mm - Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 9.00" / 229 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 179,547 shp / 133,942 Kw = 33.00 kts Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 3,598 tons Complement: 1,195 - 1,554 Cost: £4.081 million / $16.323 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,642 tons, 5.1 % Armour: 7,670 tons, 24.0 % - Belts: 2,532 tons, 7.9 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 789 tons, 2.5 % - Armament: 1,458 tons, 4.6 % - Armour Deck: 2,696 tons, 8.4 % - Conning Tower: 195 tons, 0.6 % Machinery: 6,376 tons, 19.9 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 13,602 tons, 42.5 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,260 tons, 10.2 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 41,011 lbs / 18,602 Kg = 24.3 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 4.8 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.14 Metacentric height 5.4 ft / 1.6 m Roll period: 16.1 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 55 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.93 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11 Hull form characteristics: Hull has low quarterdeck , a ram bow and a cruiser stern Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.534 / 0.540 Length to Beam Ratio: 8.92 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 28.18 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -3.00 degrees Stern overhang: -4.00 ft / -1.22 m Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length): Fore end, Aft end - Forecastle: 20.00 %, 31.00 ft / 9.45 m, 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Forward deck: 30.00 %, 28.00 ft / 8.53 m, 27.00 ft / 8.23 m - Aft deck: 18.00 %, 27.00 ft / 8.23 m, 27.00 ft / 8.23 m - Quarter deck: 32.00 %, 19.00 ft / 5.79 m, 19.00 ft / 5.79 m - Average freeboard: 25.03 ft / 7.63 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 117.1 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 211.5 % Waterplane Area: 48,585 Square feet or 4,514 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 110 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 183 lbs/sq ft or 896 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.96 - Longitudinal: 1.34 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
So, as built, what speed could the Renown and Repulse make?
I did an experiment to see what the Renown and Repulse, as built, might have been able to make in 1916. My guess is about 33 knots, if the machinery was pressed hard. The report in the 1919 Jane's Fighting Ships that they had reached 41 knots is a joke. Even if they were extremely light, I find that sort of speed to be very doubtful. I might try reducing ammunition supply and fuel to see if they might have been able to faster, without compromising strength too severely. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment