GB/CB/1915 design study, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1915 (Engine 1950)
Displacement:
34,888 t light; 36,564 t standard; 39,099 t normal; 41,127 t full load
Dimensions: Length (overall / waterline) x beam x draught (normal/deep)
(855.20 ft / 850.00 ft) x 105.00 ft x (25.90 / 27.00 ft)
(260.67 m / 259.08 m) x 32.00 m x (7.89 / 8.23 m)
Armament:
8 - 15.00" / 381 mm 45.0 cal guns - 1,950.00lbs / 884.51kg shells, 90 per gun
Breech loading guns in turret on barbette mounts, 1915 Model
4 x Twin mounts on centreline ends, evenly spread
2 raised mounts - superfiring
16 - 5.50" / 140 mm 45.0 cal guns - 85.00lbs / 38.56kg shells, 150 per gun
Quick firing guns in deck and hoist mounts, 1915 Model
16 x Single mounts on sides, evenly spread
4 raised mounts
Weight of broadside 16,960 lbs / 7,693 kg
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 565.00 ft / 172.21 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Upper: 5.00" / 127 mm 565.00 ft / 172.21 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Main Belt covers 102 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 565.00 ft / 172.21 m 25.90 ft / 7.89 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 8.00" / 203 mm
2nd: 4.00" / 102 mm 3.00" / 76 mm 4.00" / 102 mm
- Protected deck - multiple decks: 3.00" / 76 mm For and Aft decks
Forecastle: 3.00" / 76 mm Quarter deck: 3.00" / 76 mm
- Conning towers: Forward 8.00" / 203 mm, Aft 0.00" / 0 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 184,470 shp / 137,614 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 6,500nm at 18.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 4,563 tons
Complement:
1,389 - 1,807
Cost:
£4.706 million / $18.825 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,618 tons, 6.7 %
Armour: 10,219 tons, 26.1 %
- Belts: 2,789 tons, 7.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,083 tons, 2.8 %
- Armament: 2,527 tons, 6.5 %
- Armour Deck: 3,621 tons, 9.3 %
- Conning Tower: 199 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 4,413 tons, 11.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 17,638 tons, 45.1 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,210 tons, 10.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
71,119 lbs / 32,259 Kg = 42.1 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 10.5 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.13
Metacentric height 6.8 ft / 2.1 m
Roll period: 16.9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 64 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.89
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.28
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak,
a normal bow and a cruiser stern
Block coefficient (normal/deep): 0.592 / 0.597
Length to Beam Ratio: 8.10 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 29.15 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 52 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 8.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -3.00 ft / -0.91 m
Freeboard (% = length of deck as a percentage of waterline length):
Fore end, Aft end
- Forecastle: 34.00 %, 37.00 ft / 11.28 m, 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Forward deck: 33.00 %, 32.00 ft / 9.75 m, 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Aft deck: 18.00 %, 24.00 ft / 7.32 m, 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Quarter deck: 15.00 %, 24.00 ft / 7.32 m, 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Average freeboard: 30.19 ft / 9.20 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 85.9 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 259.2 %
Waterplane Area: 64,789 Square feet or 6,019 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 121 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 202 lbs/sq ft or 985 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.42
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
A more normal GB/CB/1915 alternative design
I wondered what the GB/CB/1915 would be like with a more normal speed for the sort of power that I had envisioned. The answer is that just 32 knots seems reasonable. This design still requires the lightest possible machinery. This is the revised Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment