Ger/BB/1915 Short, Germany Battleship laid down 1915 (Engine 1927) Displacement: 54,438 t light; 57,076 t standard; 61,800 t normal; 65,579 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 703.15 ft / 700.00 ft x 120.00 ft x 42.70 ft (normal load) 214.32 m / 213.36 m x 36.58 m x 13.01 m Armament: 9 - 18.00" / 457 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,916.00lbs / 1,322.68kg shells, 1915 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, majority forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring 24 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns (12x2 guns), 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1915 Model Quick firing guns in turrets (on barbettes) on side, all amidships, 4 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 27,744 lbs / 12,584 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 90 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 18.0" / 457 mm 425.00 ft / 129.54 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 93 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 8.00" / 203 mm 425.00 ft / 129.54 m 42.00 ft / 12.80 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 18.0" / 457 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 18.0" / 457 mm 2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm - Armour deck: 8.00" / 203 mm, Conning tower: 18.00" / 457 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 101,294 shp / 75,565 Kw = 25.00 kts Range 12,000nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 8,503 tons Complement: 1,959 - 2,547 Cost: £7.660 million / $30.639 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 3,468 tons, 5.6 % Armour: 26,907 tons, 43.5 % - Belts: 5,854 tons, 9.5 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 5,284 tons, 8.5 % - Armament: 6,045 tons, 9.8 % - Armour Deck: 9,118 tons, 14.8 % - Conning Tower: 606 tons, 1.0 % Machinery: 3,197 tons, 5.2 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 20,866 tons, 33.8 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 7,362 tons, 11.9 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 88,997 lbs / 40,369 Kg = 30.5 x 18.0 " / 457 mm shells or 20.2 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.04 Metacentric height 7.0 ft / 2.1 m Roll period: 19.0 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 65 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.72 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.30 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.603 Length to Beam Ratio: 5.83 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 26.46 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 6.00 degrees Stern overhang: -1.00 ft / -0.30 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 30.00 ft / 9.14 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (67 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Average freeboard: 23.68 ft / 7.22 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 71.1 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 142.5 % Waterplane Area: 61,611 Square feet or 5,724 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 101 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 238 lbs/sq ft or 1,163 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.93 - Longitudinal: 2.04 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Saturday, June 17, 2006
The super short Ger/BB/1915 works pretty well
I have this inboard profile of what is probably the Ger/BB/1915 very short design study from the early 1970's. There is a minimal specification for the ship, and I have extrapolated the needed details, as well as taking advantage of the available slop in the design to add capability. The basic concept is for a 60,000 ton ship with 9-18in BLR and 24-5in QF guns, all in turrets. The ship has a tower foremast and a tripod mainmast, with large directors with long rangefinders. The main problem is the ridiculously deep draft, which would have been prohibitive, in practice. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment