GB/BB/1913, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1913 Displacement: 30,154 t light; 31,523 t standard; 34,500 t normal; 36,882 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 675.00 ft / 675.00 ft x 90.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load) 205.74 m / 205.74 m x 27.43 m x 9.45 m Armament: 8 - 15.00" / 381 mm guns (4x2 guns), 1,687.50lbs / 765.44kg shells, 1913 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 14 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1913 Model Quick firing guns in casemate mounts on side, evenly spread, 4 raised mounts Weight of broadside 15,012 lbs / 6,809 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm submerged torpedo tubes Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: 5.00" / 127 mm 225.00 ft / 68.58 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Main Belt covers 103 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 30.00 ft / 9.14 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 12.0" / 305 mm 2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm - Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 95,921 shp / 71,557 Kw = 27.00 kts Range 5,600nm at 17.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 5,359 tons Complement: 1,265 - 1,645 Cost: £3.445 million / $13.780 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,877 tons, 5.4 % Armour: 12,127 tons, 35.1 % - Belts: 4,372 tons, 12.7 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 999 tons, 2.9 % - Armament: 3,066 tons, 8.9 % - Armour Deck: 3,416 tons, 9.9 % - Conning Tower: 274 tons, 0.8 % Machinery: 3,759 tons, 10.9 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 12,393 tons, 35.9 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,346 tons, 12.6 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 41,367 lbs / 18,764 Kg = 24.5 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 5.8 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.05 Metacentric height 4.7 ft / 1.4 m Roll period: 17.5 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 53 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.92 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.06 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.641 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.50 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 25.98 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Forecastle (20 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m - Mid (67 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m (16.00 ft / 4.88 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m - Stern: 16.00 ft / 4.88 m - Average freeboard: 21.76 ft / 6.63 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 100.5 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 151.4 % Waterplane Area: 46,162 Square feet or 4,289 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 100 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 185 lbs/sq ft or 903 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.97 - Longitudinal: 1.33 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Thursday, November 24, 2005
OK, so now how about the 15in-gunned fast battleship
We seem to be on a roll, so let us try the 15in-gunned fast battleship to be laid down in 1913. By accepting slightly lower protection than we might otherwise have, we have a 27-knot ship with a 17 knot cruising speed and a 5,600nm range. The armour basis is 12in, which should do quite well for a WWI-style ship. I actually reduced length and beam to achieve adequate composite strength. I also have lowered the freeboard for that same end. Does this seem reasonable and useful? This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment