GB/BB/1913, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1913
Displacement:
30,154 t light; 31,523 t standard; 34,500 t normal; 36,882 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
675.00 ft / 675.00 ft x 90.00 ft x 31.00 ft (normal load)
205.74 m / 205.74 m x 27.43 m x 9.45 m
Armament:
8 - 15.00" / 381 mm guns (4x2 guns), 1,687.50lbs / 765.44kg shells, 1913 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
14 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1913 Model
Quick firing guns in casemate mounts
on side, evenly spread, 4 raised mounts
Weight of broadside 15,012 lbs / 6,809 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm submerged torpedo tubes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: 5.00" / 127 mm 225.00 ft / 68.58 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Main Belt covers 103 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 12.0" / 305 mm
2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm
- Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 95,921 shp / 71,557 Kw = 27.00 kts
Range 5,600nm at 17.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 5,359 tons
Complement:
1,265 - 1,645
Cost:
£3.445 million / $13.780 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1,877 tons, 5.4 %
Armour: 12,127 tons, 35.1 %
- Belts: 4,372 tons, 12.7 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 999 tons, 2.9 %
- Armament: 3,066 tons, 8.9 %
- Armour Deck: 3,416 tons, 9.9 %
- Conning Tower: 274 tons, 0.8 %
Machinery: 3,759 tons, 10.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 12,393 tons, 35.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,346 tons, 12.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
41,367 lbs / 18,764 Kg = 24.5 x 15.0 " / 381 mm shells or 5.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.05
Metacentric height 4.7 ft / 1.4 m
Roll period: 17.5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 53 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.92
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.06
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.641
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.50 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 25.98 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 29.00 ft / 8.84 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Mid (67 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m (16.00 ft / 4.88 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Stern: 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Average freeboard: 21.76 ft / 6.63 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 100.5 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 151.4 %
Waterplane Area: 46,162 Square feet or 4,289 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 100 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 185 lbs/sq ft or 903 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.33
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Thursday, November 24, 2005
OK, so now how about the 15in-gunned fast battleship
We seem to be on a roll, so let us try the 15in-gunned fast battleship to be laid down in 1913. By accepting slightly lower protection than we might otherwise have, we have a 27-knot ship with a 17 knot cruising speed and a 5,600nm range. The armour basis is 12in, which should do quite well for a WWI-style ship. I actually reduced length and beam to achieve adequate composite strength. I also have lowered the freeboard for that same end. Does this seem reasonable and useful? This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment