J/CA/1923, Japan Heavy Cruiser laid down 1923 (Engine 1937)
Displacement:
13,116 t light; 13,630 t standard; 14,800 t normal; 15,736 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
680.80 ft / 675.00 ft x 62.00 ft x 22.00 ft (normal load)
207.51 m / 205.74 m x 18.90 m x 6.71 m
Armament:
10 - 8.00" / 203 mm guns (5x2 guns), 256.00lbs / 116.12kg shells, 1923 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
8 - 4.70" / 119 mm guns in single mounts, 51.91lbs / 23.55kg shells, 1923 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships
24 - 2.24" / 57.0 mm guns (12x2 guns), 5.65lbs / 2.56kg shells, 1923 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships, 6 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 3,111 lbs / 1,411 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
12 - 24.0" / 609.6 mm above water torpedoes
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 3.50" / 89 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 103 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.00" / 25 mm 450.00 ft / 137.16 m 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 2.00" / 51 mm, Conning tower: 4.00" / 102 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 148,942 shp / 111,111 Kw = 35.00 kts
Range 7,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,107 tons
Complement:
670 - 872
Cost:
£3.967 million / $15.868 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 389 tons, 2.6 %
Armour: 2,874 tons, 19.4 %
- Belts: 1,040 tons, 7.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 333 tons, 2.3 %
- Armament: 356 tons, 2.4 %
- Armour Deck: 1,094 tons, 7.4 %
- Conning Tower: 52 tons, 0.4 %
Machinery: 4,128 tons, 27.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 5,726 tons, 38.7 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 1,684 tons, 11.4 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
14,745 lbs / 6,688 Kg = 57.6 x 8.0 " / 203 mm shells or 1.8 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.19
Metacentric height 3.4 ft / 1.0 m
Roll period: 14.2 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 52 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.68
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.04
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.563
Length to Beam Ratio: 10.89 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 25.98 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 58 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 5.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.00 ft / 0.91 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Mid (50 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Average freeboard: 22.48 ft / 6.85 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 163.3 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 135.2 %
Waterplane Area: 29,554 Square feet or 2,746 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 104 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 115 lbs/sq ft or 562 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.30
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Perhaps I was too ambitious with the J/CA/1923 design
I wanted to have a speed of 35 knots for the J/CA/1923 design, and to achieve that at this date required lighter weight machinery and a deeper draft. The higher speed is the only change between this design and its predecessor. The length, draft, freeboard, and displacement needed to grow to satisfy Springsharp. Perhaps, 34 knots would have been more reasonable, so that the range could have been increased. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment