F/CA/1917, France Heavy Cruiser laid down 1917 (Engine 1941) Displacement: 17,267 t light; 17,873 t standard; 19,200 t normal; 20,262 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 731.31 ft / 729.00 ft x 80.00 ft x 24.00 ft (normal load) 222.90 m / 222.20 m x 24.38 m x 7.32 m Armament: 6 - 11.00" / 279 mm guns (2x3 guns), 665.50lbs / 301.87kg shells, 1917 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline, all forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring 8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1917 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships Weight of broadside 4,857 lbs / 2,203 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 10.00 ft / 3.05 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 84 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Torpedo Bulkhead: 0.75" / 19 mm 400.00 ft / 121.92 m 23.00 ft / 7.01 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 3.00" / 76 mm 4.00" / 102 mm 2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm 2.00" / 51 mm - Armour deck: 1.75" / 44 mm, Conning tower: 4.00" / 102 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 187,527 shp / 139,895 Kw = 36.00 kts Range 7,500nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 2,388 tons Complement: 815 - 1,060 Cost: £3.288 million / $13.150 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 607 tons, 3.2 % Armour: 2,833 tons, 14.8 % - Belts: 691 tons, 3.6 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 255 tons, 1.3 % - Armament: 589 tons, 3.1 % - Armour Deck: 1,236 tons, 6.4 % - Conning Tower: 62 tons, 0.3 % Machinery: 4,956 tons, 25.8 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 8,871 tons, 46.2 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 1,933 tons, 10.1 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 22,191 lbs / 10,065 Kg = 33.3 x 11.0 " / 279 mm shells or 2.6 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.20 Metacentric height 5.0 ft / 1.5 m Roll period: 15.0 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 54 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.54 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.08 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.480 Length to Beam Ratio: 9.11 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 27.00 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 58 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 4.00 degrees Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 33.00 ft / 10.06 m - Forecastle (20 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Mid (62 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m - Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m - Average freeboard: 25.36 ft / 7.73 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 143.0 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 224.5 % Waterplane Area: 38,169 Square feet or 3,546 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 109 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 150 lbs/sq ft or 730 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.95 - Longitudinal: 1.55 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Sunday, May 21, 2006
The F/CA/1917 Mod.A from the Red Book drawing
The next page in the Red Book is a drawing of what I have been calling the F/CA/1917 Mod.A cruiser. This drawing has the advantage that it shows the armoured length of the citadel. I have raised the freeboard and increased the draft to see if I could obtain a higher speed, while still maintaining a modest protection. The armament is 9-11in guns in triple turrets, grouped forward, with 8-6in QF guns amidships, with shields. I have included a thin torpedo bulkhead. I also slightly increased the displacement. Springsharp rates the survivability higher than I would have expected:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment