Ger/CB/1915 design study, Enter country Enter ship type laid down 1915 (Engine 1927) Displacement: 42,889 t light; 44,780 t standard; 46,800 t normal; 48,416 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 851.12 ft / 850.00 ft x 110.00 ft x 32.00 ft (normal load) 259.42 m / 259.08 m x 33.53 m x 9.75 m Armament: 9 - 16.50" / 419 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,246.06lbs / 1,018.80kg shells, 1915 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, majority forward 10 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships, 2 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 21,295 lbs / 9,659 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m Ends: Unarmoured Upper: 12.0" / 305 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m Main Belt covers 87 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - - - Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 227,396 shp / 169,638 Kw = 33.00 kts Range 5,600nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 3,636 tons Complement: 1,590 - 2,068 Cost: £6.897 million / $27.590 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 2,662 tons, 5.7 % Armour: 13,108 tons, 28.0 % - Belts: 4,306 tons, 9.2 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 995 tons, 2.1 % - Armament: 2,710 tons, 5.8 % - Armour Deck: 4,817 tons, 10.3 % - Conning Tower: 280 tons, 0.6 % Machinery: 7,178 tons, 15.3 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 19,942 tons, 42.6 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,911 tons, 8.4 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 56,408 lbs / 25,586 Kg = 25.1 x 16.5 " / 419 mm shells or 6.9 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.17 Metacentric height 7.7 ft / 2.4 m Roll period: 16.6 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 56 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.66 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.547 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.73 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 29.15 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 54 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m - Forecastle (20 %): 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Mid (64 %): 29.00 ft / 8.84 m (21.00 ft / 6.40 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 21.00 ft / 6.40 m - Stern: 21.00 ft / 6.40 m - Average freeboard: 26.36 ft / 8.03 m Ship tends to be wet forward Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 112.4 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 206.0 % Waterplane Area: 65,098 Square feet or 6,048 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 96 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 215 lbs/sq ft or 1,052 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.97 - Longitudinal: 1.36 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Monday, July 25, 2005
My Ger/CB/1915 design study doesn't work without changes
To make my Hood-looking German battlecruiser design study for a Ger/CB/1915 class, I had to increase the displacement and draft to achieve adequate structural strenght. I also had to decrease freeboard, oddly enough, to reduce weight. I also was not able to achieve the 16,650 tons of protection of that I had wanted. The armor basis is 12in, which is adequate, but it suffers from having been originally a 9in armor basis that had a thicker belt added. Instead of four twin turrets, this design has three triple turrets. Otherwise, it resembles the Hood. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment