Ger/CB/1915 design study, Enter country Enter ship type laid down 1915 (Engine 1927)
Displacement:
42,889 t light; 44,780 t standard; 46,800 t normal; 48,416 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
851.12 ft / 850.00 ft x 110.00 ft x 32.00 ft (normal load)
259.42 m / 259.08 m x 33.53 m x 9.75 m
Armament:
9 - 16.50" / 419 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,246.06lbs / 1,018.80kg shells, 1915 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward
10 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 21,295 lbs / 9,659 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Upper: 12.0" / 305 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 87 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 480.00 ft / 146.30 m 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 10.0" / 254 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 227,396 shp / 169,638 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 5,600nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,636 tons
Complement:
1,590 - 2,068
Cost:
£6.897 million / $27.590 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,662 tons, 5.7 %
Armour: 13,108 tons, 28.0 %
- Belts: 4,306 tons, 9.2 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 995 tons, 2.1 %
- Armament: 2,710 tons, 5.8 %
- Armour Deck: 4,817 tons, 10.3 %
- Conning Tower: 280 tons, 0.6 %
Machinery: 7,178 tons, 15.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 19,942 tons, 42.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,911 tons, 8.4 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
56,408 lbs / 25,586 Kg = 25.1 x 16.5 " / 419 mm shells or 6.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.17
Metacentric height 7.7 ft / 2.4 m
Roll period: 16.6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 56 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.66
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.547
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.73 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 29.15 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 54 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 29.00 ft / 8.84 m
- Mid (64 %): 29.00 ft / 8.84 m (21.00 ft / 6.40 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
- Stern: 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
- Average freeboard: 26.36 ft / 8.03 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 112.4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 206.0 %
Waterplane Area: 65,098 Square feet or 6,048 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 96 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 215 lbs/sq ft or 1,052 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.36
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Monday, July 25, 2005
My Ger/CB/1915 design study doesn't work without changes
To make my Hood-looking German battlecruiser design study for a Ger/CB/1915 class, I had to increase the displacement and draft to achieve adequate structural strenght. I also had to decrease freeboard, oddly enough, to reduce weight. I also was not able to achieve the 16,650 tons of protection of that I had wanted. The armor basis is 12in, which is adequate, but it suffers from having been originally a 9in armor basis that had a thicker belt added. Instead of four twin turrets, this design has three triple turrets. Otherwise, it resembles the Hood. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment