Ger/BB/1915 short, Germany Battleship laid down 1915 Displacement: 55,547 t light; 58,093 t standard; 65,000 t normal; 70,525 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 702.62 ft / 700.00 ft x 120.00 ft x 42.70 ft (normal load) 214.16 m / 213.36 m x 36.58 m x 13.01 m Armament: 9 - 18.00" / 457 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,916.00lbs / 1,322.68kg shells, 1915 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, majority forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring 24 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns (12x2 guns), 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1915 Model Quick firing guns in turrets (on barbettes) on side, all amidships, 4 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 27,744 lbs / 12,584 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 18.0" / 457 mm 425.00 ft / 129.54 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 93 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 4.00" / 102 mm 425.00 ft / 129.54 m 40.00 ft / 12.19 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 18.0" / 457 mm 12.0" / 305 mm 18.0" / 457 mm 2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm - Armour deck: 8.00" / 203 mm, Conning tower: 18.00" / 457 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 143,768 shp / 107,251 Kw = 27.00 kts Range 8,500nm at 18.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 12,432 tons Complement: 2,035 - 2,646 Cost: £8.174 million / $32.696 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 3,468 tons, 5.3 % Armour: 24,965 tons, 38.4 % - Belts: 5,867 tons, 9.0 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 2,516 tons, 3.9 % - Armament: 6,568 tons, 10.1 % - Armour Deck: 9,387 tons, 14.4 % - Conning Tower: 627 tons, 1.0 % Machinery: 5,446 tons, 8.4 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 21,668 tons, 33.3 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 9,453 tons, 14.5 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 84,351 lbs / 38,261 Kg = 28.9 x 18.0 " / 457 mm shells or 14.7 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.03 Metacentric height 7.0 ft / 2.1 m Roll period: 19.1 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 56 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.72 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.634 Length to Beam Ratio: 5.83 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 26.46 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 5.00 degrees Stern overhang: -1.00 ft / -0.30 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 30.00 ft / 9.14 m - Forecastle (20 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Mid (67 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m - Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m - Average freeboard: 25.52 ft / 7.78 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 80.7 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 153.1 % Waterplane Area: 63,424 Square feet or 5,892 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 102 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 239 lbs/sq ft or 1,166 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.92 - Longitudinal: 2.07 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Wednesday, July 27, 2005
The "short" German Ger/BB/1915 design is rather bizarre
The salient feature of the Ger/BB/1915 Short design is the abnormally deep draft. The draft, at 42.7ft is too deep, really, but that is what was planned. The drawing has dimesions and displacement, but is otherwise bereft of detail. I have taken another run at estimating characteristics and doing a Springsharp design. This is a 65,000 ton ship of only 700ft length, but with 9-18in and 24-5in guns. I assumed an armor basis of 18in. I suspect that I did not realize, back in 1971, that a decent speed might be achievable. The short length was a drastic weight-saving measure, and it seems to have worked. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment