Ger/BB/1915 Design Study, Germany Battleship laid down 1915 (Engine 1927)
Displacement:
51,332 t light; 53,622 t standard; 56,500 t normal; 58,803 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
842.57 ft / 841.00 ft x 120.00 ft x 31.90 ft (normal load)
256.82 m / 256.34 m x 36.58 m x 9.72 m
Armament:
12 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (4x3 guns), 2,048.00lbs / 928.96kg shells, 1915 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 25,872 lbs / 11,735 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 80 % of normal length
Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 29.00 ft / 8.84 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 16.0" / 406 mm
2nd: 4.00" / 102 mm - -
- Armour deck: 5.00" / 127 mm, Conning tower: 16.00" / 406 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 172,046 shp / 128,346 Kw = 29.50 kts
Range 7,200nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 5,181 tons
Complement:
1,832 - 2,382
Cost:
£7.671 million / $30.682 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 3,234 tons, 5.7 %
Armour: 19,061 tons, 33.7 %
- Belts: 5,080 tons, 9.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 934 tons, 1.7 %
- Armament: 5,621 tons, 9.9 %
- Armour Deck: 6,919 tons, 12.2 %
- Conning Tower: 508 tons, 0.9 %
Machinery: 5,431 tons, 9.6 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 23,606 tons, 41.8 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,168 tons, 9.1 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
77,793 lbs / 35,286 Kg = 38.0 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 11.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.10
Metacentric height 7.8 ft / 2.4 m
Roll period: 18.0 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 55 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.67
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.614
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.01 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 29.00 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 3.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 30.00 ft / 9.14 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Mid (50 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Stern: 25.00 ft / 7.62 m
- Average freeboard: 25.40 ft / 7.74 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 88.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 194.4 %
Waterplane Area: 74,799 Square feet or 6,949 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 101 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 235 lbs/sq ft or 1,147 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.98
- Longitudinal: 1.21
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The alternative Ger/BB/1915 Design Study
Another alternative design study was for a Ger/BB/1915 battleship. This was 841ft x 120ft x 31.9ft. The intended standard displacement was 50,000 tons. That turns out to be rather low, as more displacement was needed to allow for adequate hull strength. The armament was 12-16 and 12-6in guns. I only had the planned weights, so I adjusted the protection to match. I scaled off the pencil drawing, which resembles that for the Ger/BB/1915-1916 design. I had expected that 170,000 SHP would be needed for 27.5 knots, but I was able to achieve 29.5 knots for slightly less power. I adjusted the machinery date to obtain the desired machinery weight. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment