Ger/BB/1915 Design Study, Germany Battleship laid down 1915 (Engine 1927) Displacement: 51,332 t light; 53,622 t standard; 56,500 t normal; 58,803 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 842.57 ft / 841.00 ft x 120.00 ft x 31.90 ft (normal load) 256.82 m / 256.34 m x 36.58 m x 9.72 m Armament: 12 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (4x3 guns), 2,048.00lbs / 928.96kg shells, 1915 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships, 2 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 25,872 lbs / 11,735 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 80 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 16.0" / 406 mm 2nd: 4.00" / 102 mm - - - Armour deck: 5.00" / 127 mm, Conning tower: 16.00" / 406 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 172,046 shp / 128,346 Kw = 29.50 kts Range 7,200nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 5,181 tons Complement: 1,832 - 2,382 Cost: £7.671 million / $30.682 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 3,234 tons, 5.7 % Armour: 19,061 tons, 33.7 % - Belts: 5,080 tons, 9.0 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 934 tons, 1.7 % - Armament: 5,621 tons, 9.9 % - Armour Deck: 6,919 tons, 12.2 % - Conning Tower: 508 tons, 0.9 % Machinery: 5,431 tons, 9.6 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 23,606 tons, 41.8 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,168 tons, 9.1 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 77,793 lbs / 35,286 Kg = 38.0 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 11.0 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.10 Metacentric height 7.8 ft / 2.4 m Roll period: 18.0 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 55 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.67 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.11 Hull form characteristics: Hull has a flush deck Block coefficient: 0.614 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.01 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 29.00 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 51 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 3.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 30.00 ft / 9.14 m - Forecastle (20 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Mid (50 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Quarterdeck (15 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Stern: 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Average freeboard: 25.40 ft / 7.74 m Ship tends to be wet forward Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 88.8 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 194.4 % Waterplane Area: 74,799 Square feet or 6,949 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 101 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 235 lbs/sq ft or 1,147 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.98 - Longitudinal: 1.21 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Sunday, August 14, 2005
The alternative Ger/BB/1915 Design Study
Another alternative design study was for a Ger/BB/1915 battleship. This was 841ft x 120ft x 31.9ft. The intended standard displacement was 50,000 tons. That turns out to be rather low, as more displacement was needed to allow for adequate hull strength. The armament was 12-16 and 12-6in guns. I only had the planned weights, so I adjusted the protection to match. I scaled off the pencil drawing, which resembles that for the Ger/BB/1915-1916 design. I had expected that 170,000 SHP would be needed for 27.5 knots, but I was able to achieve 29.5 knots for slightly less power. I adjusted the machinery date to obtain the desired machinery weight. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment