GB/BB/1905, Great Britain Battleship laid down 1905 (Engine 1927) Displacement: 22,756 t light; 23,532 t standard; 25,000 t normal; 26,175 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 680.00 ft / 680.00 ft x 87.70 ft x 28.00 ft (normal load) 207.26 m / 207.26 m x 26.73 m x 8.53 m Armament: 6 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (3x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1905 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, majority forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring 8 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns (4x2 guns), 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1905 Model Quick firing guns in turrets (on barbettes) on side, all amidships Weight of broadside 6,048 lbs / 2,743 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 13.4" / 340 mm 355.00 ft / 108.20 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 80 % of normal length - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 13.4" / 340 mm 8.00" / 203 mm 13.4" / 340 mm 2nd: 3.63" / 92 mm 3.63" / 92 mm 3.63" / 92 mm - Armour deck: 4.50" / 114 mm, Conning tower: 6.75" / 171 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, No drive to shaft, 4 shafts, 86,351 shp / 64,418 Kw = 28.00 kts Range 6,200nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 2,643 tons Complement: 993 - 1,292 Cost: £1.813 million / $7.252 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 756 tons, 3.0 % Armour: 9,297 tons, 37.2 % - Belts: 3,396 tons, 13.6 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 % - Armament: 2,395 tons, 9.6 % - Armour Deck: 3,382 tons, 13.5 % - Conning Tower: 124 tons, 0.5 % Machinery: 2,726 tons, 10.9 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,978 tons, 39.9 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,244 tons, 9.0 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 49,094 lbs / 22,269 Kg = 56.8 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 4.6 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.03 Metacentric height 4.4 ft / 1.3 m Roll period: 17.6 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 82 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.71 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.65 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.524 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.75 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 26.08 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -1.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m - Forecastle (20 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m - Mid (64 %): 30.00 ft / 9.14 m (22.00 ft / 6.71 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m - Stern: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m - Average freeboard: 27.28 ft / 8.31 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 58.7 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 213.6 % Waterplane Area: 40,622 Square feet or 3,774 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 120 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 158 lbs/sq ft or 772 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.93 - Longitudinal: 1.91 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather
Amazon Ad
Saturday, August 20, 2005
An expansive view of the GB/BB/1905 fast battleship design
In 1973, I decided to see how far many of my friend Cliff's designs could be stretched, primarily by using lighter machinery. I have a page with a pencil sketch and specifications for a version with machinery that produced 30 SHP/ton. The original concept was to have a light armament, but good armor protection. That meant 6-12in/45 BLR and 8-6in QF guns. The armor basis was 13.4in and was in the "all-or-nothing" pattern. I used the citadel length from the drawing, even though Springsharp thinks that is short. The dimensions were 680ft x 87.7ft x 28ft with a displacement of 25,000 tons. I have assumed that meant normal, not standard displacement. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment