GB/BB/1908 Design Study, Enter country Enter ship type laid down 1908
Displacement:
22,148 t light; 22,997 t standard; 26,000 t normal; 28,403 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
570.00 ft / 570.00 ft x 105.00 ft x 25.70 ft (normal load)
173.74 m / 173.74 m x 32.00 m x 7.83 m
Armament:
8 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (4x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1908 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1908 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships
Weight of broadside 7,296 lbs / 3,309 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 80
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Upper: 8.00" / 203 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 100 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
2.00" / 51 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 24.00 ft / 7.32 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 10.0" / 254 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 6.00" / 152 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 4 shafts, 47,120 shp / 35,151 Kw = 23.00 kts
Range 7,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 5,406 tons
Complement:
1,023 - 1,330
Cost:
£1.874 million / $7.498 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 912 tons, 3.5 %
Armour: 9,700 tons, 37.3 %
- Belts: 2,375 tons, 9.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 657 tons, 2.5 %
- Armament: 1,658 tons, 6.4 %
- Armour Deck: 4,821 tons, 18.5 %
- Conning Tower: 189 tons, 0.7 %
Machinery: 2,380 tons, 9.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,156 tons, 35.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,852 tons, 14.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
51,600 lbs / 23,405 Kg = 59.7 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 10.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.25
Metacentric height 8.0 ft / 2.5 m
Roll period: 15.6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 73 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.31
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.45
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak, raised quarterdeck
Block coefficient: 0.592
Length to Beam Ratio: 5.43 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 23.87 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m
- Mid (67 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m (0.00 ft / 0.00 m before break)
- Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m
- Average freeboard: 21.90 ft / 6.68 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 69.9 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 172.2 %
Waterplane Area: 43,432 Square feet or 4,035 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 120 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 159 lbs/sq ft or 778 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.94
- Longitudinal: 1.77
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Apparently, the 26,000 ton battleship was supposed to have 12in guns
I have a sheet with some notes that the 26,000 ton battleship drawing had 8-12in guns and some notes about armor thickness on turret and barbette. The armor basis appears to have been only 10in, with oddly thin turret faces and thick tops. That is the sort of feature that my friend Cliff with have, as he was an experimenter. The dimensions were 570ft x 105ft x 25.7ft with a displacement of 26,000 tons. I treated that here as if it were normal, not standard. The benefit of a design like this is that they tend to have better seakeeping ability than the tighter designs. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment