GB/BB/1908 Design Study, Enter country Enter ship type laid down 1908 Displacement: 22,148 t light; 22,997 t standard; 26,000 t normal; 28,403 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 570.00 ft / 570.00 ft x 105.00 ft x 25.70 ft (normal load) 173.74 m / 173.74 m x 32.00 m x 7.83 m Armament: 8 - 12.00" / 305 mm guns (4x2 guns), 864.00lbs / 391.90kg shells, 1908 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 12 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1908 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships Weight of broadside 7,296 lbs / 3,309 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m Ends: Unarmoured Upper: 8.00" / 203 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m Main Belt covers 100 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 370.00 ft / 112.78 m 24.00 ft / 7.32 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - - - Armour deck: 6.00" / 152 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 47,120 shp / 35,151 Kw = 23.00 kts Range 7,000nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 5,406 tons Complement: 1,023 - 1,330 Cost: £1.874 million / $7.498 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 912 tons, 3.5 % Armour: 9,700 tons, 37.3 % - Belts: 2,375 tons, 9.1 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 657 tons, 2.5 % - Armament: 1,658 tons, 6.4 % - Armour Deck: 4,821 tons, 18.5 % - Conning Tower: 189 tons, 0.7 % Machinery: 2,380 tons, 9.2 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 9,156 tons, 35.2 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,852 tons, 14.8 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 51,600 lbs / 23,405 Kg = 59.7 x 12.0 " / 305 mm shells or 10.0 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.25 Metacentric height 8.0 ft / 2.5 m Roll period: 15.6 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 73 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.31 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.45 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak, raised quarterdeck Block coefficient: 0.592 Length to Beam Ratio: 5.43 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 23.87 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (67 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m (0.00 ft / 0.00 m before break) - Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Average freeboard: 21.90 ft / 6.68 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 69.9 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 172.2 % Waterplane Area: 43,432 Square feet or 4,035 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 120 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 159 lbs/sq ft or 778 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.94 - Longitudinal: 1.77 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Thursday, August 25, 2005
Apparently, the 26,000 ton battleship was supposed to have 12in guns
I have a sheet with some notes that the 26,000 ton battleship drawing had 8-12in guns and some notes about armor thickness on turret and barbette. The armor basis appears to have been only 10in, with oddly thin turret faces and thick tops. That is the sort of feature that my friend Cliff with have, as he was an experimenter. The dimensions were 570ft x 105ft x 25.7ft with a displacement of 26,000 tons. I treated that here as if it were normal, not standard. The benefit of a design like this is that they tend to have better seakeeping ability than the tighter designs. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment