GB/BB/1909 Battleship-Cruiser, Great Britain Battleship-Cruiser laid down 1909 Displacement: 29,004 t light; 30,193 t standard; 33,250 t normal; 35,696 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 680.00 ft / 680.00 ft x 95.00 ft x 28.00 ft (normal load) 207.26 m / 207.26 m x 28.96 m x 8.53 m Armament: 8 - 13.50" / 343 mm guns (4x2 guns), 1,230.19lbs / 558.00kg shells, 1909 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 16 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1909 Model Quick firing guns in casemate mounts on side, all amidships, 4 raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 10,354 lbs / 4,696 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 90 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 490.00 ft / 149.35 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m Ends: 5.00" / 127 mm 190.00 ft / 57.91 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m Main Belt covers 111 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 490.00 ft / 149.35 m 27.00 ft / 8.23 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 12.0" / 305 mm 7.00" / 178 mm 12.0" / 305 mm 2nd: 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm 5.00" / 127 mm - Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 12.00" / 305 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 94,822 shp / 70,738 Kw = 27.00 kts Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 5,503 tons Complement: 1,230 - 1,600 Cost: £2.706 million / $10.823 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,294 tons, 3.9 % Armour: 11,501 tons, 34.6 % - Belts: 4,840 tons, 14.6 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 979 tons, 2.9 % - Armament: 2,685 tons, 8.1 % - Armour Deck: 2,730 tons, 8.2 % - Conning Tower: 267 tons, 0.8 % Machinery: 4,310 tons, 13.0 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 11,899 tons, 35.8 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,246 tons, 12.8 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 49,661 lbs / 22,526 Kg = 40.4 x 13.5 " / 343 mm shells or 7.4 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.14 Metacentric height 5.9 ft / 1.8 m Roll period: 16.4 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 61 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.59 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.21 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.643 Length to Beam Ratio: 7.16 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 26.08 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 52 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -2.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 29.00 ft / 8.84 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (67 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Average freeboard: 23.60 ft / 7.19 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 90.8 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 181.2 % Waterplane Area: 49,188 Square feet or 4,570 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 109 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 172 lbs/sq ft or 838 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.97 - Longitudinal: 1.33 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Thursday, October 27, 2005
How about a 1909 British Battleship-Cruiser
I thought that it would be interesting to try again to design a British "Battleship-Cruiser" (William Hovgaard-style) where the ship was fast, but had battleship armour. For 1909, a 13.5in-gun armament seemed appropriate. The secondary battery necessarily needed to be 16-4in QF guns for this date. I went with an armour basis of 12in with a 27-knot speed. It is so much more capable than the Lion class ships. Partly, this ship is larger, and partly, the all-oil fuel is a factor. The machinery is normal weight. I could not justify "all-or-nothing" in 1909, so the ends are armoured. From my perspective, this seems the ideal capital ship to be laid down in 1909. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment