GB/CB/1910, Great Britain Battlecruiser laid down 1910 Displacement: 23,084 t light; 24,075 t standard; 26,250 t normal; 27,990 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 620.00 ft / 620.00 ft x 90.00 ft x 27.00 ft (normal load) 188.98 m / 188.98 m x 27.43 m x 8.23 m Armament: 8 - 13.50" / 343 mm guns (4x2 guns), 1,230.19lbs / 558.00kg shells, 1910 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 16 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1910 Model Quick firing guns in casemate mounts on side, evenly spread 12 guns in hull casemates - Limited use in heavy seas Weight of broadside 10,354 lbs / 4,696 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 80 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 185.00 ft / 56.39 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Main Belt covers 108 % of normal length - Torpedo Bulkhead: 2.00" / 51 mm 435.00 ft / 132.59 m 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 10.0" / 254 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 2nd: 6.00" / 152 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 6.00" / 152 mm - Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm, Conning tower: 10.00" / 254 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Direct drive, 4 shafts, 61,921 shp / 46,193 Kw = 25.00 kts Range 5,600nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 3,915 tons Complement: 1,030 - 1,340 Cost: £2.253 million / $9.013 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,294 tons, 4.9 % Armour: 9,038 tons, 34.4 % - Belts: 3,413 tons, 13.0 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 837 tons, 3.2 % - Armament: 2,312 tons, 8.8 % - Armour Deck: 2,286 tons, 8.7 % - Conning Tower: 190 tons, 0.7 % Machinery: 2,559 tons, 9.7 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 10,194 tons, 38.8 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3,166 tons, 12.1 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 40,978 lbs / 18,587 Kg = 33.3 x 13.5 " / 343 mm shells or 6.6 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.09 Metacentric height 5.0 ft / 1.5 m Roll period: 16.9 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 69 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.81 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.39 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.610 Length to Beam Ratio: 6.89 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 24.90 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 50 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): -1.00 degrees Stern overhang: -1.00 ft / -0.30 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (65 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m (18.00 ft / 5.49 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (15 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Stern: 18.00 ft / 5.49 m - Average freeboard: 23.36 ft / 7.12 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 88.3 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 179.3 % Waterplane Area: 41,187 Square feet or 3,826 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 107 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 172 lbs/sq ft or 841 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.95 - Longitudinal: 1.63 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily
Amazon Ad
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
My concept for a British battleship-cruiser, circa 1910
I had a small sketch with specifications dating from January 1999 for a British battleship-cruiser or fast battleship. The dimensions were 620ft x 90ft x 27ft with a displacement of 23,500 tons. If that was intended to be normal, it turns out to be too low for Springsharp. I had to increase the displacement to 26,250 tons for there to be adequate composite strength. The increased length and reduced armament would lead you to believe that a higher speed than 21 knots was intended. In the Springsharp design, I opted for a 10in armor basis, in keeping with the idea of a higher speed. I was able to achieve 25 knots with all the compromises that had been made. The "look" is rather odd, having three funnels, no foremast, and a pole mainmast. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment