Ger/CA/1915, Germany Armoured Cruiser laid down 1915 (Engine 1927)
Displacement:
21,233 t light; 22,005 t standard; 23,500 t normal; 24,696 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
726.08 ft / 725.00 ft x 80.00 ft x 25.00 ft (normal load)
221.31 m / 220.98 m x 24.38 m x 7.62 m
Armament:
8 - 9.40" / 239 mm guns (4x2 guns), 419.00lbs / 190.06kg shells, 1915 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
10 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 101.00lbs / 45.81kg shells, 1915 Model
Quick firing guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
Weight of broadside 4,362 lbs / 1,979 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 120
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 6.00" / 152 mm 555.00 ft / 169.16 m 17.00 ft / 5.18 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 118 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1.00" / 25 mm 555.00 ft / 169.16 m 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 8.00" / 203 mm 4.00" / 102 mm 6.00" / 152 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - -
- Armour deck: 4.00" / 102 mm, Conning tower: 6.00" / 152 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 156,174 shp / 116,506 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 6,500nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,691 tons
Complement:
948 - 1,233
Cost:
£2.757 million / $11.029 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 550 tons, 2.3 %
Armour: 6,910 tons, 29.4 %
- Belts: 2,322 tons, 9.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 452 tons, 1.9 %
- Armament: 985 tons, 4.2 %
- Armour Deck: 3,044 tons, 13.0 %
- Conning Tower: 106 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 4,930 tons, 21.0 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 8,843 tons, 37.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,267 tons, 9.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
34,067 lbs / 15,453 Kg = 82.0 x 9.4 " / 239 mm shells or 4.1 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.17
Metacentric height 4.8 ft / 1.5 m
Roll period: 15.4 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 59 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.52
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.19
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle, rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.567
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.06 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 26.93 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 2.00 degrees
Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 31.00 ft / 9.45 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 29.00 ft / 8.84 m (28.00 ft / 8.53 m aft of break)
- Mid (73 %): 28.00 ft / 8.53 m (20.00 ft / 6.10 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Stern: 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Average freeboard: 26.20 ft / 7.99 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 115.2 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 219.2 %
Waterplane Area: 41,138 Square feet or 3,822 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 111 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 139 lbs/sq ft or 677 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.34
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Amazon Ad
Thursday, June 30, 2005
This is about 50%, or so, larger than planned: Ger/CA/1915
The Ger/CA/1915 (or whatever the year was) fast armoured cruiser was originally planned to be just 14,000 tons (!). That was over optimistic by a good bit. The only way that the other might just possibly have worked would have been to have very high power output machinery. The basic idea was to have a 6in armour basis with 8-9.4in guns (25 ton) with a 419lb APC shot. The secondary armament was 106in guns (5.5 ton) with a 101 lb. shot. The armour deck was thick, being 4inches. I had actually wanted a lower splinter deck of 3in. which I omitted here, as it seemed too extreme, even for me. This is the Springsharp report:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment