Ger/CB/1915a1, Germany Battlecruiser laid down 1915 Armoured gunboat Displacement: 38,617 t light; 40,325 t standard; 43,773 t normal; 46,532 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 900.58 ft / 900.00 ft x 100.00 ft x 29.00 ft (normal load) 274.50 m / 274.32 m x 30.48 m x 8.84 m Armament: 6 - 16.50" / 419 mm guns (2x3 guns), 2,246.06lbs / 1,018.80kg shells, 1915 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on bow with limited arc, all raised mounts Main guns limited to end-on fire 12 - 6.00" / 152 mm guns in single mounts, 108.00lbs / 48.99kg shells, 1915 Model Quick firing guns in deck mounts on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts Weight of broadside 14,772 lbs / 6,701 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 100 Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 4.00" / 102 mm 500.00 ft / 152.40 m 16.00 ft / 4.88 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 85 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 9.00" / 229 mm 6.00" / 152 mm 9.00" / 229 mm 2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm - - - Armour deck: 3.00" / 76 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 240,309 shp / 179,270 Kw = 34.00 kts Range 8,000nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 6,208 tons Complement: 1,513 - 1,967 Cost: £6.076 million / $24.303 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 1,847 tons, 4.2 % Armour: 7,270 tons, 16.6 % - Belts: 1,387 tons, 3.2 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 % - Armament: 2,274 tons, 5.2 % - Armour Deck: 3,609 tons, 8.2 % - Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 % Machinery: 9,103 tons, 20.8 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 20,398 tons, 46.6 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 5,157 tons, 11.8 % Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 53,683 lbs / 24,350 Kg = 23.9 x 16.5 " / 419 mm shells or 3.2 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.10 Metacentric height 6.0 ft / 1.8 m Roll period: 17.1 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 62 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 1.02 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.24 Hull form characteristics: Hull has rise forward of midbreak Block coefficient: 0.587 Length to Beam Ratio: 9.00 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 30.00 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 1.00 degrees Stern overhang: -2.00 ft / -0.61 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 33.00 ft / 10.06 m - Forecastle (18 %): 32.00 ft / 9.75 m - Mid (75 %): 32.00 ft / 9.75 m (25.00 ft / 7.62 m aft of break) - Quarterdeck (18 %): 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Stern: 25.00 ft / 7.62 m - Average freeboard: 30.32 ft / 9.24 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 99.2 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 255.4 % Waterplane Area: 65,029 Square feet or 6,041 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 109 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 211 lbs/sq ft or 1,029 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.97 - Longitudinal: 1.34 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily Warning: Limited arc turret/barbette not allowed - Main battery
Amazon Ad
Friday, January 07, 2005
One of my design studies: Ger/CB/1915a1
One of my many design studies (one of the more extreme) was for a 900ft long battlecruiser with 9-16.5in guns and a 40 knot speed. The speed seems to be not practical (that should be obvious), but I was able to get 34 knots with Springsharp. The planned load displacement was 40,000 tons, but I had to grow the design to work. This was a design with two triple turrets forward and the secondary battery on the sides:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment